This is the first of a short series of rants and resolutions about why charity boards/governance structures are often a pale imitation of what they should be, and what we intend to do to change that.
Why it matters
Boards should be a big deal. In theory, they’re about the leadership of an entire organisation:
- they set the tone for a charity’s direction and running
- they continually push the operation, challenging it to do everything it can to fulfil its stated purpose
- they represent the communities the charity is working with, and make sure its work is actually serving the intended beneficiaries
In theory. But, too often, boards don’t live up to this billing – instead becoming just a managerial tickbox exercise, dragging endlessly along in the background to make sure the quota of meetings is met and the accounts get filed on time.
We want to do better.
We’re lucky to have an awesome board who are working with us to do this. They’re not the typical “male, pale and stale” board – but they want to do more, and so do we. Because it’s in everyone’s interest for charities to have kickass boards and governance.
‘We don’t do politics’
Let’s start by looking at the problem of quiet, passive, non-disruptive, don’t-rock-the-boat governance – and why that’s about to become an even bigger issue in the UK.
The Ministry of Silence
‘If you want to improve lives through charity, leave political fights out of it, writes Charity Commission chair BARONESS STOWELL’The Daily Mail, 28 November 2020
There is currently a big push to ‘manage’ what charities say and/or emphasise in their work.
In the past couple of days, this agenda has been spelled out painfully, shamefully openly by the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, Oliver Dowden:
Now, it’s true that charities have legal obligations about avoiding party politics – but this is something else. This is the word ‘politics’ being weaponised to attack charities that are engaging with the real world, accusing them of “starting culture wars about ‘wokedom’”.
Keep calm and stroke my ego
There’s a call for the bygone era of Victorian style charitable giving, where donating to the poor and needy gave a warm glow to those upper class philanthropists. Like Ebenezer Scrooge giving a turkey to the Cratchit family, immediately making up for all those years of forced evictions and extortionate rents for slums.
The message is basically “don’t question anything the government does, don’t look at the root causes of why your charity has to exist, and whatever you do, don’t mention Britain’s colonial past”.
The fallacy of ‘neutrality’
But here’s the thing: not engaging with the challenges of today’s society isn’t apolitical. It’s not a ‘neutral’ position. It’s an active choice to maintain the status quo and the privileged which it serves.
Telling inconvenient truths
The arts are about telling stories, engaging with people, and exploring and reflecting the human experience. The stories which get heard, who tells them and what they say, will be political – not like ‘vote for Lord Buckethead!’ party political, but political because they will unavoidably touch on questions of how we live and act as a society.
Over the next year, Strike A Light will be supporting artists and communities making work about food banks, the climate emergency and Black history.
Is it possible to do this without being ‘political’? Or should we just stage plays about the upper middle classes, written by dead white men? Is that less ‘political’?
It doesn’t even matter how much substance you cut out from your content, how many ‘touchy issues’ you avoid or how vacuous you make your material: the very act of choosing which stories to tell is itself political. You will always be centring, normalising or privileging one experience over another.
Find me a story that isn’t political. I promise you, it doesn’t exist.
AND ANOTHER THING! As if this effort to favourably ‘control the narrative’ weren’t bad enough already, it’s also directly contradictory to other demands also being made of arts charities.
In the 2020 New Year’s Eve fireworks display, the UK watched a sea turtle made of drones swimming through the sky – even as we failed to meet any of our 2020 carbon emission targets.
We paid lip service to Black Lives Matter in the same year that DCMS told cultural organisations that if they want to be funded they should steer clear of talking about “contested heritage”.
The Charity Commission can’t say to charities in their annual public meeting that they want to involve people from more diverse backgrounds and then a month later publish an article where they ask charities to pretend racism doesn’t exist.
Except that’s exactly what the Commission did.
This means there’s a fundamental disconnect between public messaging and the structures and funding that accompany them. How can you as an organisation genuinely commit to addressing climate change or lack of diversity – things we are repeatedly asked to do by government funders – without addressing the structures which create those problems and which perpetuate them? Complicit silence is not apolitical.
These are the most significant, pressing issues of our time. Life is political and if charities are to exist in and be relevant to society and fulfil their charitable aims for the public benefit then they must engage with the public and with society and therefore with politics.
A plan to change the system of industry leadership
If there’s one thing we’ve concluded at Strike A Light, it’s that if you want things to change, the system has to change – and the leadership in the industry has to change.
So we’re going to try something different with our governance.
We’re cooking up a new plan. One where you can get involved with Strike A Light governance without a long term commitment, share your skills and ideas, find out more about how the board works and get paid for your time in a workshop format.
We’re focusing on different topics each time and the first we want to tackle is arts charities and politics.
How do we support artists and communities to make work which is about the world around us, which isn’t afraid to question and challenge, whilst working within the legal requirements of the charity structure regarding politics?
Over the year we’ll also be looking at finance and fundraising, and what a cultural programme driven by artists and communities could and should look like.
We’ve drafted and shared a plan for how we’re going to change our governance structures.
If you’re interested in being part of this exploration and sharing your ideas and experience to support Strike A Light to achieve its charitable aims, we’d love to hear from you.